Washington — American politics is heating up after Representative Chip Roy and Senator Marco Rubio introduced the American Courts Act of 2025, quickly dubbed the controversial “Sharia-Free America Act.” The bill aims to prohibit federal courts from applying any foreign legal system—including Sharia—if it conflicts with rights protected by the U.S. Constitution.

Supporters of the bill argue that the goal is to protect constitutional rights and prevent foreign legal norms from infiltrating the American justice system. Representative Chip Roy argues that no citizen should face penalties or regulations that “go against fundamental rights such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and gender equality.”

Senator Marco Rubio’s remarks during the debate quickly went viral on social media, as he emphasized what he called “uncrossable” boundaries in American courtrooms. This iconic statement triggered a wave of mixed reactions, placing the bill at the center of the national debate.

Conversely, progressive groups and civil rights organizations criticized the bill as religiously discriminatory, arguing that its naming and messaging could harm the American Muslim community, whose freedom of religion is protected by the Constitution. They warned that generalizations could lead to misunderstandings and even discrimination.

The controversy intensified when polls showed that approximately 68% of Americans, including a segment of Democratic voters, supported banning the application of foreign legal doctrines that conflict with the Constitution. Supporters of this figure saw it as evidence of widespread public concern for legal sovereignty and the supremacy of the Constitution.

Legal experts note that U.S. law already prioritizes the Constitution and federal law, so the practical impact of the bill—if passed—needs careful consideration. However, they also acknowledge the significant political and symbolic implications, particularly in the context of elections and debates about identity, religious freedom, and legal security.

As the bill moves into congressional committees for consideration, the battle of arguments between the two sides is likely to escalate. What is certain is that, with its attention-grabbing name and strong statements, “Sharia-Free America” has become the focal point of a national debate about the line between protecting the Constitution and respecting religious diversity—a debate that promises further developments.