Washington — The debate over immigration in the U.S. has flared up again following a war of words between Representative Ilhan Omar and former Acting ICE Director Tom Homan, turning this already divisive issue into a new political focal point for the nation.

In a striking statement, Ilhan Omar argued that the current hardline approach to immigration is inconsistent with the spirit envisioned by the Founding Fathers when they wrote the Constitution. “This is certainly not what the Founding Fathers of the American Dream had in mind when they began writing the Constitution,” Omar said, emphasizing that America was built by immigrants and needs a more inclusive policy.

In response, Tom Homan sharply countered, asserting that the hardline administration is adhering to the Constitution and strictly enforcing the law. “Unlike the Biden administration, we are acting in accordance with the Constitution, enforcing the law, not ignoring it,” Homan said, emphasizing that assimilation is important and will be required for immigrants.

Homan also rejected accusations of racism against ICE, claiming the force is “colorblind,” focusing only on whether an individual complies with immigration laws. According to him, law enforcement is not based on origin or ethnicity, but on regulations enacted by Congress.

The war of words quickly spread across media and social networks, attracting millions of conflicting comments. Supporters of Omar argued she was defending the spirit of diversity and America’s historical values, while supporters of Homan considered her tough stance necessary to maintain order and the rule of law.

Analysts believe this controversy reflects two opposing interpretations of the Constitution: one emphasizing the nation’s flexibility and immigrant spirit, the other focusing on executive power and the duty to enforce the law. As the election season approaches, confrontations like Omar–Homan are likely to continue, further heating up the national debate about immigration, identity, and the future of America.